Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Teaching is Hard Work

3 comments:

Andrew Miller said...

"The elders at a church must develop a clear position on these topics, even if that position is that Scripture leaves room for disagreement."

Would you be so kind as to clarify what you mean here? I was taken aback when I read this, as if it were a suggestion that the Word of God is up for debate by anyone who chooses to do so.

Perhaps it's just the Catholic in me, and I confess that I don't know much about the Protestant views on Authority past the fact that y'all don't have a Magesterium, but I may have read you completely wrong, so I'd just like a little clarification.

Chris Krycho said...

First, thanks for dropping in and commenting!

Scripture itself is not up for debate, by any means. Its authority is something we assume. However, we recognize that there are areas where Christians can legitimately reach different conclusions. Ultimately, one of those conclusions is correct and the others are wrong; that does not necessarily mean that the answer is immediately (or indeed ever) clear.

There are a number of areas where the teaching of Scripture leaves some room for interpretation—a prominent example in our my writing recently being the question of whether previously divorce and remarried men may serve as elders. Scripture is somewhat ambiguous on the point. Accordingly, I would argue that one legitimate conclusion for the elders to present is that, well... Scripture doesn't answer this one definitively, so there is room in the church for a variety of positions. The same might be said for our view of the end times; very good arguments have been made for each of post-, a-, and premillennial views. One of them is right; Scripture, however, leaves us enough room that there is nothing wrong with believers reasonably disagreeing on that particular issue.

We certainly have a different view of authority in Protestant circles; that said, PJ and I have a much higher regard for tradition and the input of church history than mainstream evangelicals do. I think you'd find that many younger lovers of theology are increasingly interested in patristics and tradition as informative to (though certainly not definitive of) our understanding of Scripture. Accordingly, on issues like the charismatic gifts, we might let the historical teachings of the church inform our understanding, even as we hold Scripture itself to ultimately be authoritative over and above tradition.

Jaimie Krycho said...

While reading this, I kept thinking over and over about how we are working to please God, and not man--doing everything as unto him. I've often wondered what it would look like for a church to depend so thoroughly on Scripture--sola scriptura-- that they make it very clear they do not believe there is room for argument on different topics. I can imagine myself in such a situation--I might be offended by something I didn't want to hear, but I actually think that would help spark profitable conversation between me and other members of the church, including elders I might not otherwise talk to. If people are handling the text with godliness and Godward-ness in mind, it shouldn't veer off into empty and angry debate.

Post a Comment

We welcome your comments—whether you agree or disagree with us—as long as they are polite, kind, and thoughtful. Please supply your name, and if you have a website, provide a link!

Personal attacks, trolling, spam and anonymous posts will be deleted. See our full comments policy for details and clarification.

If you are writing a particularly long comment, you may want to check it against the 4000-character limit.